I would like to format the table of contents using our Martin and Zannier as a guide.   What are people's thoughts?

Here are the headings I propose.  We could have subheadings (the pages we are building) under each of these main heading:  I put a few subheadings just as an example.

School Librarian as Library Adminstrator

Mission Statements       Operation and Borrowing Procedures

School Librarian as Information Specialist

School Librarian as Teacher and Instructional Specialist

Evaluation

Selected Policy Documents

Essential Sources

Book Jobbers     Selection Tools

Wiki Work Times:

Lindsey- Saturday Afternoon

Kate- Saturday Morning Just an update - I worked on financial, selection tools, advocacy (renamed School Library Advocacy), and began Collection Development this morning.

Kathy- Sunday Morning

Jamie- Sunday Afternoon

Question from Kate: Can we agree on a common term to use when talking about 1) School library, 2) School librarian and 3) school library supervisor? These terms are the ones Mona uses in her assignment description - is it okay with everyone?  I would prefer to use school library and school librarian.  I believe that the AASL has moved away from the term media specialist.

Meeting Minutes:

Please have your rough draft done by Tuesday evening (if at all possible). 

We will meet again in the Wimba classroom on Friday at 5pm.

Each county duo will meet to divide the work.

All members will need to post their individual mission statements, vision statements, and biography information.

I didn't want to change the table of contents format yet as I know I need it in that order to know what

I know I suggested trying to make the list smaller, but should we have a section devoted to facilities? 

I think it is very important to have a well-designed media center. Just wondering what your thoughts were on this.